global industry association · China

    shaping the future of natural diamonds in China

    Reassessed what natural diamonds meant to a new generation and defined how the category could remain distinctive as consumer expectations shifted and synthetic alternatives emerged.

    defend the category

    how do you protect an entire category when consumer meaning is changing and a new alternative is emerging?

    the natural diamond industry needed to understand whether the foundations of the category still held in china — what diamonds meant to a new generation, which occasions remained relevant, where new behaviours were emerging, and how synthetic diamonds could alter perceptions of value.

    across several workstreams, we built a strategic view of the category and the narratives natural diamonds could credibly own. younger consumers still strongly associated diamonds with love and meaningful moments, but the market was broadening toward self-reward, daily wear and personal expression.

    what we designed

    a china category framework for natural diamonds — defining what to protect, what to evolve, and what should become more important next. we identified the enduring sources of value in natural diamonds, the occasions and meanings gaining relevance with younger consumers, and the territories that could create separation from synthetic alternatives. that led to communication platforms built around authentic emotion, natural origin, rarity, personal stories and meaningful life moments, supported by a separate assessment of how sustainability and social responsibility could strengthen the category narrative.

    strategic output

    a china category strategy for natural diamonds — defending their distinctive value while evolving the category for a new generation.

    how we built the view

    3,500 quantitative surveys · consumer depth interviews · kol + media interviews · focus groups · trade interviews · 8 cities · occasion analysis · synthetic-diamond testing · communications testing

    facing a similar decision?

    discuss it with a partner →

    related cases